Opinions published

Even if the details of the tramway on the surface are not given, I prefer the tunnel scenario because it allows us to preserve the trees in the forest. But it should not be enough to work underground.

See attachment. https://tram-t10-prolongement.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/126/2023/04/Concert_preal_cahier_dacteur_230417_AUT.pdf

This project to extend through the city centre of Clamart, whether on the surface or underground, seems to me to be mind-blowing. It does not meet the needs of the people of Clamart, even less those o

It makes no sense to favour a surface solution that is a source of nuisance, which is more expensive and slower. On the other hand, it is a shame not to continue the underground to the M12 and to the

This extension will serve the plateau and small Clamart. He is not really going to serve the people of Clamar in the centre, in the Shneider and Percy districts. It will be very expensive, imposing ve

Hello I am in favour of the extension of the suburbs. Burying the HV lines and removing the piones from the forest would be counterproductive if the extension is done on the surface. More and more th

hello being in the station district of Clamart, I am very much in favor of the extension of the T10 to the station of clamart because I see a real interest in it. Indeed I find it very interesting wit

I am against the extension of the T10 tram

I think that the extension is necessary in order to ensure the link with the future metro line 15. The underground option seems to have more advantages and preferable in terms of delays.

Prefer the underground solution to avoid overloading the communication routes on the surface. However, it will be necessary to properly isolate the tracks from the vibrations that could be caused by t