Opinions published

I am against this project, which has a colossal cost, completely disproportionate for a section of about 4 km. Probable ecological disaster (destruction of the forest), major deterioration of Clamarto

Hello, a real interconnection between transport would be very welcome. This would make it possible to declutter the streets of Clamart, It would be very useful for me, to get to Antony, I could go the

I'm sorry, but from the beginning of the project, the arrival at Place du Garde seemed to me to be nonsense! no connection with the buses except one! In addition, the surface crossing reduced traffic

The tunnel solution is the best option for me and my wife. Resident of the Jardin Parisien Rue Gabrielle district All the arguments argue in this direction: less nuisance, lower cost, ease of circul

Rather than a choice between underground and above, why not start by holding a referendum among the people of Clamartois? Most of those who say they are "in favour" do not realise the pollution and mo

Hello I think that the extension of the tram is a good thing because stopping it on the heights brought very little advantage. The fact that it is buried can be a good solution to reduce external nu

Clamart is a peaceful town, with a nice balance between pavilions, apartment buildings, natural areas and industrial sectors. The current public transport network is perfectly adapted and does not req

In principle, I am in favour of the development of the public transport network, which is the only way to reduce car traffic, which is becoming impossible in the inner suburbs - and in particular in C

I learned of your consultation on the T10 extension project through the magazine "Les nouvelles de Chatenay-Malabry" in April. This extension creates interesting connections to reach Paris (and the we

In my opinion, the tunnel route would be more judicious and less impactful