Opinions published

The extension of the T10 is essential to make public transport more fluid, reduce car use and allow quick access to Paris and Issy-les-Moulineaux

The costs per km announced are 3 times higher compared to the costs of other projects in the IDF. The trams on the line are no longer a standard product, so the costs that will be added are also very

Hello the prospect of being able to benefit from a fast, guaranteed and underground connection to the metro network via line 15 and train with line N is really good news. Thanks to this we will be ab

Ok for solution on land

I hope that this project will not cause any expropriation. I hope that will be the case with the tunnel scenario. For this reason, I completely reject the script on the surface. Before the delivery o

It seems to me that this oversized project is dangerous for the people of Clamart, given the state of the city's soils. We only have declarative figures on the use of this tram. What would be the econ

Useless, costly and dangerous project for the city (impact on houses given the structure of the soil). Developing buses seems much more relevant.

I support the project to extend the T10 tramway to the future metro line 15 of Greater Paris. and my choice is the underground route (more ecological and economical)

The duration of the construction site and the choice of the location of the tunnel boring machine so close to the forest and the houses leaves no choice: I am against the extension of the tram

A titanic project to save only a few minutes of travel time compared to the buses currently. It would be much easier to develop bus lanes or to increase the frequency of buses than to undertake such