Opinions published

It is a useful project for the population if it is done underground Eric Juhe

I am very much in favour of the project with Tunnel because it meets a real need of our inhabitants who have to go every day to the west of Paris" (La DÉFENSE...) The option with tunnel seems to me to

Hello First of all, thank you for the public presentation, which was very interesting. However, I still have one question: Why is the Centre station not positioned at the level of the rue Pierre Louvr

I am in favour of the underground route for the main reason that I do not conceive of a tramway route in the small narrow streets of the city centre. There is no room for the tram.... However, I am su

I think the scenario with 5 saves is better. It allows people from Clamart but also from Meudon to be able to use it more easily

I am in favour of the project to extend the T10 tram according to the proposed scenario 1, i.e. the surface route In my opinion, this project responds to 2 challenges - connect as many Clamartois as

The variant route on the surface is clearly preferable. Even if the inconveniences during the work are greater and the commercial speed lower than the underground route, the overall cost remains lower

A preference for the tunnel scenario which seems more reasonable for the environment, the city's budget, future traffic... And yet it will lead to lasting disorder during the work period. Indeed, the

This project makes no sense, it is excessively expensive for a more than questionable usefulness. In addition, it presents risks for the environment both in the construction and operation phases (impa

The terminus at the Jardin Parisien station is strange... I am very much in favour of the project to extend the line to the station. The tunnel seems preferable to me so as not to penalise car traffic