Opinions published

for the handicapped it would be good to put escalators for the south and north forecourt; on the way up as well as on the way down: then I would approve the project.

Hello For the car parks, I have a fairly simple idea, construction of a car park on the field (currently flooded) next to the wheat silos, a pedestrian bridge over the Seine bridge. And then a direct

-Scenario B (underground) -Good idea: move the current "wart" (bus office), located in the center of the square. -Other proposals: a priori good

By creating the footbridge to the east between the bus station and the Ermitage district, and by doubling this elevated passage with an underpass (current, enlarged and transformed into a service to t

1/ A high footbridge does not seem to be a solution for the north/south or south/north crossing of Melun because of the difference in altitude, which is very significant. scenario A and C. The use wil

I think that solution B is the most suitable, because the space reserved for taxis is far too large compared to its current use, the demand being much lower than in the past. In addition, the locati

I think that the whole tower at the station spoils a view and a landscape, it doesn't make the beauty of the station sector more fluid and darkens the station sector, we really need to change the land

Being a local resident, my clear preference is for scenario B, which allows local residents a more "transparent" crossing of the station;

Solution B seems to be the best solution (more comfortable for everyone and especially for people with reduced mobility)

Are you going to keep the bus stops in the direction of Dammarie on Avenue Thiers? Currently, there is an aggravating danger for people. This forces people to move on the road..... crossing between th