Opinions published

In view of the increase in the population in the area by 2035 and the need for travel, it is essential to promote a rapid and high-capacity public transport solution, with the least impact on the urba

After examining the 2 routes and their respective impacts, in particular the surface route which would remove a wooded area, I support the tunnel route which would be less restrictive in terms of work

Of course I'm in favour of the extension. Rapprochement between the inhabitants of the upper and lower parts of Clamart. Looking at your two projects, I said to myself, maybe there is another alternat

I think the best solution is the tunnel

Hello For my part, having a tram running is already a pollution for the landscape so I am in favour of it passing through a tunnel at Clamart. Especially since it is out of the question to have a tram

I love my city, its calm, seeing it ransacked to allow the inhabitants of neighboring municipalities to cross it to get faster to Paris and La Défense, what a disaster. The current work gives us a for

I think it should accelerate a little more for the start of the school year

Hello Thank you for sharing information. I would like to know to what extent the underground route will cause nuisances (tremors, noise, etc.) for above-ground housing. What technical measures have

I work in La Défense and for me today, using public transport to get there is very heavy. I have to take the car.

In March 2014, the STIF published a plan presenting the Grand Paris projects in which it awarded this line, which is scheduled to be commissioned in 2023 On 10 July 2013, the STIF (Ile de France Mobil