Opinions published

Hello For my part, I opt for scenario C in order to have a forecourt that is as uncluttered as possible and not to keep nooks and crannies behind buildings. The most important thing in my opinion is

I would like the cheapest project (i.e. the €12 million) project to be adopted for Noisy le Sec for the following reasons: 1/ The town of Noisy le Sec is very ugly and especially the area around the s

For my part, I would opt for scenario C. The forecourt must be as clear as possible to prevent drug traffickers and other street vendors from hiding in the small corners. Having more space on this fo

1) 90% of the entrances will be on the side of rue Jean-Jaurès and rue de la République. Building the access bridge to the platforms far from the current entrance means asking 90% of passengers to tra

------- Analysis of your presentation: 1/ Objective for better intermodality: >Extras:: Enlarged forecourt allowing a visual perspective, especially for people taking the tram >Cons: The bus stops on

It seems to me a shame that the projects presented all propose to move the footbridge and move it away from its current location in relation to the tram 1 station. If the transformation of the passeng

Scenario C preferred

Hello Currently, large-scale work is being carried out on the banks of the Canal de l'Ourcq (6000 more homes) and in the Sablière district. Buildings are also being built in Petit Noisy. An entrance

Hello As a future resident of the ZAC Ourcq housing that will be delivered at the end of the year, I would like access to the Noisy RER station on the Petit Noisy side, as has been proposed by some c

I would favour scenario B to have a properly sized forecourt, within an average budget envelope, and to preserve the existing shops and the parallelism of the two rotunda buildings; Scenario C is not