Opinions published

I vote for opinion 1

Scenario 1 seems to me to be more adapted to the needs of the city (parking, accessibility, promotion of green mobility (bicycle, metro, etc.). The city of Drancy needs to finally launch itself into m

Hello Scenario 1 makes it possible to update resources in the face of the growth in mobility while maintaining what has been achieved. I have a question about the safety of the bicycle parking. Ho

Hello As a resident of Drancy myself for more than twenty years, I would like to see this tunnel and mini car park project see the light of day. Indeed, a large amount of traffic jams caused every da

The project should include a reserve for a future extension of metro line 7, if possible at a location not too far from the Grand Paris Express station on lines 16 and 17.

No parking, houses

The redevelopment of the Le Bourget-Drancy station will lead to a lot of changes in the area and it is necessary to ensure that visually impaired people will be able to access and benefit from the ent

Hello extending metro line 7 by making it pass through the RER B Le Bourget station and extending this line to the Air and Space Museum, that would be good too a good network and faster access to Pa

Resident of Le Bourget and regular user of lines B and 7. For me, the ideal would have been the extension of line 7 to the RER station of Le Bourget... Scenario 1 is my preference, for the slightly

Hello why not extend metro line 7 to connect it to this new hub, it would be good for all exchanges (RER B, metro lines 16 and 17)? Ideally extend line 7 (metro) to the Air Museum to easily access t