Opinions published

I prefer route 3 because I currently use bus 118 to get either to Vincennes or Val de Fontenay but the frequency of this bus is such that it is faster to get there on foot....

This extension is essential: Vincennes Est is poorly served despite a growing population and infrastructures that bring in people (the new swimming pool for example). Bus 118 is always crowded, even d

Of the three routes, the 2nd, passing through La Fontaine, seems the most interesting. This option makes it possible not to have to build a "Val de Fontenay Sud". On the other hand, La Fontaine is loc

Isn't the cost of construction by project N°1 too risky in terms of safety and cost? Let me explain, the Grands Pêchers station is located right on a free land and why free and without any constructio

Very demanding!! Preference traced 3 verdun.

Who is this survey on the Vincennes town hall website for? The answers are almost exclusively from residents of Fontenay and Montreuil, who of course would all like to have the metro on their doorstep

I prefer route 3 because I currently use bus 118 to get either to Vincennes or Val de Fontenay but the frequency of this bus is such that it is faster to get there on foot....

My choice is route 3. For a high-speed city, not just in terms of computers/internet, communication is also progress in transport, to be able to move everywhere, for a city rich in culture.

This project does not even need to be discussed. It's just a matter of course and a necessity. We have to do it quickly, quickly and quickly!!

The 3 routes provide an undeniable service to homes in the areas served. If I have to choose, I opt for route C, this station will lead to a change in the urban landscape.