Opinions published

TOTALLY AGREE IT WOULD FACILITATE THE USERS

Unfavorable for a simple reason: there are only two metro lines that are not systematically vandalized at the moment (or very little): line 14 and line 1. The only ones that are almost entirely "intra

More precision should be given on the layout and longitudinal profile of the variants. Depth of the stations, in particular "Verdun", Types of access, PMR standards? etc...

Hello Extending line 1 means: - give easier access to Paris, its events, and culture - Shorten commuting times for people using the bus - reduce vehicle use and make neighbourhoods less noisy, less po

I'm in favour of the route that goes through Montreuil, because this part of the city is not at all accessible by metro. We need a "Grands Pêchers" station.

I don't understand why we forget Nogent sur Marne once again. So simple to extend in a straight line. Montreuil will have the tram and Fontenay will have the large multimodal hub. Nogent remains isola

Route No. 1 serving the Grands Pêchers seems the most judicious, it serves a greater number of inhabitants in a district with relatively poor public transport service. Currently, compared to the other

Wouldn't it be possible to use the existing infrastructure of the RATP RUE EUGÈNE MARTIN to install the station? Will there be expropriations of buildings and residential buildings to be expected? Hav

Thanks to the extension of line 1, I will save at least 45 minutes of public transport per day to make the Paris - fonenay sous Bois shuttle. For my wife even more!beyond the tps earns, the quality of

I think that route 3 would be better for the extension of line 1 thank you for your understanding