Opinions published

If the objective is to serve a district isolated from transport, I think that the 2nd stop should be put at the Grands Pêchers which mixes a lot of people with only buses.

For Vincennes, there are only disadvantages to line 1 being extended to Fontenay. The metro will be crowded from Vincennes, as is the case with the RER A. The plus for Vincennes is to have a metro at

Currently access to public transport requires taking the bus, which sometimes takes 25 minutes to get to Vincennes. I therefore strongly support this project. In addition, there is potential for densi

Buses 118 and 124 are always full during rush hour. And it's the same thing for the RER. The metro, arriving at the bottom of our house, no longer needed our car to go to work. Route 1 has the advanta

Route 3 seems to me to be better placed

It is impossible for me to be on time for my professional appointments because the RER A is saturated and as a result, is always broken down during rush hour between 8 and 10. So I use a car that I wo

Hello I prefer that the extension be done through Verdun because the transport offer is limited to buses, unlike the other routes that will be served by the tramway.

Help The buses are no longer enough and regularly leave users on the side of the road because they are full. The upper Montreuil is regularly cut off from public transport with the winter weather, no

Route No. 2, passing through the future Fontaine station, seems to me to be the most appropriate: an "efficient" connection with Val-de-Fontenay (with the RER in particular), without overloading the n

Hello In order to properly assess the various routes envisaged, it would be necessary to have an accurate map at a sufficient scale for the entire project. The excerpts available here and there show