Opinions published

I prefer option 1, which goes through the Grands Pêchers. This area is currently poorly served by transport. My mother (84 years old and a resident of Montreuil for 50 years) currently has to take 3 b

After the Rigollots stop, I would like the line to pass through Fontaine, which would make it possible not to be too far from the Grands Pêchers district, nor from the Verdun district.

I think that the route including an intermediate station at Grands Pêchers would make it possible to serve more people. It is also the track that saves the most time (2* more time saved!) We are looki

The heights of Montreuil represent a relatively dense and densely populated urban fabric. This urban area is devoid of any public transport facilities as can be the areas between "Les Rigolots" and th

Living in the provinces, we regularly go to see our children and grandchildren in Fontenay.... but what a hassle to get there!! when we arrive in the evening we are forced to take a taxi.... it would

Route 3 seems to me to be the best: shorter, therefore faster and less expensive.

I am in favour of route 3

I am in favor of route 1 (Grand Pêcher station) because it will save me a significant amount of time (today 1h30) to get to my workplace.

Route 3 serves half as many inhabitants as the other two and has worse connection times. For these reasons, we do not want it to be retained. If we consider the existing connections between Grands Pêc

Would make the Victor Hugo and Larris districts of Fontenay more attractive, which are currently very poorly served by public transport.