Opinions published

Do we have the means? Once the loans of the State and the Ile de France Region have been repaid, in this case we could consider this project...

I think that routes 1 and 2 are the most consistent. In my opinion, there must be a connection between the metro, the RER A and the RER E. When there are problems on the RER (and this often happens),

I am fiercely opposed to the Verdun station because, unlike the other 2, this option will require the expropriation of several inhabitants around the Place du 8 Mai 1945 on the east side, and those, r

The N3 route is my preference, but above all I would like to remind you that since 2005, the law has required that establishments open to the public be accessible to people with disabilities. I regret

Against this project. Not only is there no seat in the RER but there we will no longer be sure to have one in the metro... super! When you are dependent on transport, you settle nearby, sorry for thos

Yes to the extension of line 1, which I have heard about since I was a child, and without waiting until 2030, which will make it possible to avoid congestion on the Vincennes roads and therefore to re

Vote for route 2 and Rigollots station to the west, under Avenue de la République

Completely in favour of the extension project. I am in favour of route n°1 through the Grands Pêchers, giving the project a regional dimension. However, I saw during the public meetings and by reading

Route 2 has the disadvantage of being too close to the future Val de Fontenay EST resort. I am in favour of route 3 because it will make it possible to revitalise an area that lacks transport solution

The current RER stations in Fontenay serve the centre and the south, so route 3 would be very welcome, making it possible to serve the west and the north, and would also benefit the people of Montreui