Opinions published

Route 3 bis is the most suitable because it serves an area of greater population density, not to mention the shops, theatre, social housing and the town hall of Fontenay.

I would like line 1 to serve the Boulevard de Verdun

Given the information provided, the most logical project is route 1 - however, my preference would be for route 3 if a link could be established between the south and east of Val de Fontenay in order

route 3 would allow all the inhabitants of the Fontenay plateau in Montreuil to have a large access to the metropolitan network. Fontaine would be too close to the RER, no added value for the surround

Hello I live at 50, rue Gambetta in Fontenay sous Bois. I am going to work today on a scooter because I have to drop my daughter off in Vincennes beforehand. When the metro arrives in Rigollots and/or

It is already difficult to find a seat in Saint-Mandé Tourelle in the morning; as soon as the line starts beyond Château de Vincennes, there is no longer any hope of travelling seated. Fear that the l

I think the three routes are quite well thought out. However, I fear that the impact of the work has not been taken into account, Fontenay is a city with quarries and running a metro could destabilize

I support the extension of line 1 to Val de Fontenay, as the RER A is completely saturated. This would also allow the opening up of the entire umbrella area of Montreuil, Vincennes and Fontenay-sous-B

A bus should make the crest of the plateau and the intermediate station should be located on Verdun Boulevard. The disastrous problem 118 will be relieved by the arrival of metro 1. Verdun is a real c

Route 3 bis is the most suitable because it serves an area of greater population density, not to mention the shops, theatre, social housing and the town hall of Fontenay. In addition, it will allow me