Opinions published

Following the consultation on 2 December, it seems obvious that the best route is route 1 for all the criteria presented. I think that the arrival of route 3 is too far from other transport and that t

Buses are often saturated, and the project should be carried out earlier. Finally, route 3 seems to me to respond to the lack of transport in this area.

The metro in Rigollots and Verdun would reduce the number of people using the 118 bus and the traffic on Av de la République and would open up this district in the east of Paris

I vote for route 3, passing through Verdun

For reasons of good flow of people, there must be an exit at the front and at the end of the train from the design of the stations.

For route 3 (because it is further from existing transport) if it includes Val de Fontenay East. Otherwise for route 1. (Route 2 too close to Val de Fontenay and at the bottom of the Fontenay hill)

Route 3 is the only one that will relieve congestion on the RER A in Val de Fontenay!

I am worried about the budget needed to fully complete the project. Why not first build the rigollots resort common to the 3 routes? Otherwise, there is a risk that the project will be abandoned for l

Hello For me, route 3 is the one that most corresponds to the people of Fontenay, who find themselves crammed into the buses and the RER A. Route 3 corresponds to a high demand without oversaturating

Since 1934, the extension to Les Rigollots has been demanded. To further delay the start of the work, the politicians occupy the population and take care of themselves, moreover, they would be obliged