Opinions published

In my opinion, the heart of Clamart would have a hard time integrating a tramway. The work of the Grand Paris gives confidence in the underground construction ==> solution 1 Question: is an extension

The reference scenario in the tunnel is much better to avoid nuisance in Clamart with a tramway on the surface (noise and traffic jams).

I agree with my opinion for choice number 2 for the construction of an underground tunnel linking the Clamart station and the preservation of the forest.

Hello, the T10 line only makes sense if and only if there is the extension of the line in a tunnel in order to allow an interconnection between metro, tram and RER. An extension to the future line 14

Hello The tramway will make traffic flow more fluid and facilitate travel, but for it to be really effective, it must be connected to the metro in order to relieve congestion on the RERB. Otherwise,

Hello I am opposed to this project for the time being, whether it is external or underground. There is no urgency and it seems necessary to think about all the alternatives before rushing to an option

I am in favour of the extension to the station of Clamart

Hello Personally, I wonder if this project is really essential A good old bus and presto, we don't talk about it anymore and our taxes don't jump yet. The best is the enemy of the good Here is my opin

I am totally opposed to the T10 tram line that would cross Clamart, disfiguring the city. First of all, it is useless (there are already buses and the tram that goes to the Châtillon metro), then it w

The first route stopped in front of the main post office of Clamart, work was carried out at the crossroads Place du Garde in depth and today the stop is at the Parisian garden / béclère \; Do you thi