Opinions published

I have carefully read the documents of the DOCP of this project to extend the T10 tramway, from its temporary stop at the "Jardin Parisien" station in Clamart to one of the stations of line 15 of the

I think it is not relevant to extend the T10 through the city centre of Clamart. The streets are narrow and this would cause too much destruction and risk to the old buildings. An extension along a di

At a time when new public transport networks are being set up to offer suburban cities solutions that are not entirely car-based, I think it is important to connect our municipalities to the future li

The extension of the T10 tram is not adapted to the urban morphology of the city of Clamart. The 2 scenarios proposed are unrealistic, whether buried or on the surface.

The extension of the T10 does not seem to me to be a good solution. This commits the city and the inhabitants to gigantic and long-term work. The areas affected are very large, especially for the entr

I am against the two extension projects: because of the exorbitant cost. The T6 project (14 km) cost 383 million euros excluding rolling stock. We are far from the "estimated" billion for only 3 kms!

Thank you for this quality consultation. I am not in favour of the two options proposed to extend the T10, because they appear too expensive and too uncertain to date in terms of cost and impact (car

Hello I am in favour of the project to extend the T10 line with a preference for the tunnel solution. Kind regards.

It was specified in the documents of the public inquiry for phase 1 (2013), that the rate of return would be 5.5 to 7% for the T10 project after extension of the line. It was also specified that the f

In the project presented, the two solutions chosen are clearly not the right ones. We can no longer aim for solutions like these, which are - Of a truly lavish cost, while the financial constraints