Opinions published

I am worried about the extension of line t10, on the one hand, because of the deconstruction of buildings/forests necessary for the work. On the other hand, because of the quarry soil and the damage t

I think that the extension of the T10 line is a very good idea and that it really needs to be done. In addition, it seems to me more appropriate for the tram to run underground, so as not to harm biod

I agree with option 1 which envisages connecting Beclere and the Clamart station via a tunnel

The TUNNEL project seems preferable (cost, technical, aesthetic, pollution, preservation of the city's heritage, preservation of the forest, etc.) but it lacks a station for it to be as balanced as th

I am against this project because - much too expensive per km compared to projects in the IDF (factor 3) - Trains and maintenance are not even included in the budget - budgets that on average increase

We all know that national, regional, departmental and municipal budgets are quite distinct from each other. Nevertheless, with the 800 million euros (!!) allocated to this project, we could build seve

Very favourable to the underground project

Hello We refuse this project, which will be a source of nuisance during the work and once the tramway is installed. What about the impact on existing constructions: vibrations/ cracks / risk on the sh

Very good idea the underground extension of tram 10! I hope to be able to use it soon!

Importance of having a fast and reliable connection from the city center to the train station. The project on the surface seems disproportionate. Is it possible to have an alternative project with bu