Opinions published

The underground project seems the most opportune: - speed of the journey for passengers who have to return to Clamart station - Less impact on the character of the neighbourhoods it crosses On the o

In my opinion, scenario 1 would be preferable because it would really imitate the road traffic in the center of Clamart being outdoors. Scenario 2 will not change road traffic very much, which is like

During the various consultation meetings, and in particular the last one, it appeared that we lacked concrete information on alternative projects in terms of cost, impact on land and expropriations, i

The opportunity of the project is not really demonstrated, given the number of existing connections already in the south of Paris, the short distance to be covered (which can also be done on foot, by

First of all, I would like to say that I was rather in favour of extending the tramway to Clamart station, and the tunnel solution seemed suitable to me before reading the elements of the project. As

Hello, there is a small river under the avenue V. Hugo (a tributary of the Bièvre I think). Isn't this likely to cause problems for the underground solution? Has this been taken into account in the co

The cost of this project - nearly 1 billion euros (!), is disproportionate to the service provided, namely to connect Clamart Jardin Parisien to Clamart Gare. It would be much more economical - and ec

Living on the edge of Plessis Clamart, the streets/avenues of the aerial project have not been prepared to be shared by tram, bicycle, pedestrian, car and bus... The journey would be longer from Bécle

Hello, seen in Le Parisien last week: "The debt of Ile-de-France transport is exploding and is close to 9 billion euros" Let's remember that at the end of 2022, the state, after long discussions, had

For the extension without impacting our vod in the Plessis Clamart Jardin Parisien district, the streets and avenues are too small, the aerial project not having been anticipated, will be poorly funct