Opinions published

Hello to you, Following my participation in one of your consultation meetings, that of 06/04/23, I had to submit an opinion on the subject. About the 3 solutions: Solution n°0: "Do nothing" = traffic

I have lived in Clamart since 2005 and we simply need to increase the bus offer. I prefer a quiet city and the village side to nuisances and industrialization. My previous comments, although courteous

Yes, I want this tramway and I prefer the tunnel proposal because it preserves the current building and guarantees shorter journey times. In addition, this tramway would make it easier to get to work

It is much more convenient for the elderly and PRM to have access to the tram on the surface. It is also more pleasant to travel in daylight than underground, with artificial lights.

I am in favour of the underground solution of extending the T10. As this was done on the T6 to reach Viroflay from Vélisy but it was planned from the beginning. Any other solution will have the effect

The T10 construction site will destroy our beautiful forest. To avoid this, I propose to start digging the tunnel, if by misfortune this sad project is validated, at the Beclere stop of the T6.

Hello, I would prefer a tram on the surface, but given the negative constraints of a surface route, where the space will be very small for the works, the nuisance for the residents whether it is the w

Although I use public transport on a daily basis (lines 189 or 162 + lines L/N and RER C) and it will probably save me time on my way to work, I am against the extension of line T10 to Clamart station

The extension of the T10 is far too expensive and harmful to the environment whatever the option chosen. The benefit for the inhabitants is not enough for such an urban and ecological upheaval. It wou

No to the extension of the tram