Opinions published

The underground option is the only one tolerable. I live in the hyper center of Clamart. On the surface, the streets are too narrow. The surface route is unimaginable: how could a tramway cross t

Totally in favour of the underground extension of the T10 tramway in Clamart. In the event of a major conflict still possible on French territory, this tunnel and the stations buried at a depth of 22

See the attached plan which analyses the distances between stations and the access radii. The resorts are well balanced with an inter-resort distance of between 500 m and 700 m T10 Extended - Walking

Hello, I am very much in favour of the extension of the T10 and welcome this initiative! Concerning the two projects, I note that the "reference" one would deprive us of a station on Place du Garde an

I share 100% this opinion of a resident of Clamart: "The mayor is asking the people of Clamar to support the extension of the T10 tramway underground, it is already basically a truncated consultation

The presence of the two guarantors is important and, fortunately, this consultation is independent of local decision-makers. That is the procedure and they have to comply with it. I approve of the arr

I give my favourable opinion for the underground extension. The city of Clamart centre has a significant lack of public transport and the interconnections with Paris are currently too restrictive. Thi

We are against this project because it will pass through our street. The above-ground option involves expropriations, not to mention the inconvenience of the work. Already heavily penalised by the ped

One question: why? Why would you want to add more when Clamart has been overwhelmed by construction for years? It would be enough to strengthen the bus offer. The station district is saturated, why wo

The extension of the T10 is essential, as its current terminus does not allow for any multimodal exchange. The topography of the city of Clamart does not allow for an aerial route today, as traffic is