Opinions published

It is absolutely necessary to carry out this project through the underground in order to facilitate the joint networks and to be able to reach the Grand Paris Express from the whole city.

The project to extend the T10 line to the station seems to me to be self-evident as the long-term advantages are obvious in terms of attractiveness, ease of travel and the promotion of more ecological

I am in favour of the tunnel route, which will limit the ecological impact on the surface and will be less costly for taxpayers. I can't wait for the project to succeed.

The Tunnel formula will disturb the city center of Clamart less from a real estate point of view (tortuous route therefore expropriations) but also with regard to car traffic (more complicated traffic

In favour of extending the T10 as soon as possible. Thank you

The tunnel scenario seems to be the one with the least impact and the easiest to implement. However, it brings fewer amenities to the inhabitants by offering stations only in the center of Clamart wit

He is fully in favour of extending the tram, both to reduce pollution from cars and buses and to facilitate transport from Clamart to line 15 and therefore to Paris and the southern suburbs Thank you

For me, this project is not reasonable. You have to imagine that in addition to the initial cost (which will be exceeded) the maintenance costs of a tunnel will be exorbitant. It is better to use el

I live on the border between Clamart and Issy. I am voting in favour of the underground route (tunnel) of the T10 to reach the Clamart Grand Paris express station.

Hello If the extension of the T10 tramway seemed obvious from the beginning of the project, the underground route also seems logical. Whether it is the time saved to connect the Jardin Parisien to t