Opinions published

A reading of the DOCP seems to confirm what we instinctively suspected for several years: that the above-ground project presents crippling difficulties in terms of integration. Too many land acquisiti

Why an extension that will cost a lot of money and possibly dangerous to the construction.et that has not been planned to connect to the station of Clamart or line 15, so a long change. Then 2 soluti

Clamart is a peaceful town, with a good balance between detached houses, apartment buildings, natural areas and industrial sectors. The current public transport network is perfectly adapted and does n

The basic principle that has been imposed and retained in the 2 projects presented is that the tram must pass through the Clamart Town Hall and aim at the station. It's that or no tram. It's not silly

Tunnel project = Ransacking the forest Surface project = Ransacking of a heritage Fair and sensible alternatives: Expanding the bus network Connect the t10 to the t6 to the Châtillon-Montrouge

I am in favour of extending the T10 to Clamart station With a preference for the above-ground project which seems less restrictive and will easily adapt to the streets of Clamart

Hello I live on Avenue Victor Hugo and I am very worried about the impact of the future T10 on homes in terms of vibrations. My questions are as follows: - How deep will the tunnel pass? - What will

I am in favour of extending the T10 tramway, which would shorten the journey to reach the departmental administrations of Nanterre. Maurice Dardant

Hello, I am in favour of the extension of the T10 line which would connect the T10 to the Clamart station and thus offer us the possibility of making a connection with the Transilien N line and the fu

Hello The stop and end of the T10 at the Parisian plain-garden stadium of Clamart is already good, but it makes no sense if there is not an extension to the Clamart station. If no extension, what will