Opinions published

The extension to the new metro in Clamart is an absolute necessity. Currently, the only connection (apart from the Châtillon-Velizy tram) is with the RERB in Antony, a line that is certainly structuri

I have a favourable opinion on the extension of the T10 underground in order to preserve the visual of the city. This project will give a new attractiveness to our city

I am in favour of this project, which opens up transfers between municipalities. This will make life easier for people who are aging or without cars, limit it to the use of cars and the planet loves t

We need to increase the public transport offer in Clamart and thus reduce the use of cars in the city. It is necessary to choose transport offers that minimise travel times, a key factor in everyone's

Hello I am not in favour of this extension for several reasons: - Surface project - Impact on the forest + expropriation - What about parking spaces? - underground project: the risks seem to be presen

This project is very expensive and will impact the forest regardless of the solution chosen. It would be better to extend to the Place du Garde without widening Avenue Trebignaud (1 lane of car traffi

What is the use of this T10 tram to stop at the Jardin Parisien? For it to be of real use, it must imperatively join the Grand Paris metro. The best route and the best solution is to go underground, l

I am against the underground project because it does not take into account the subsoil of Clamart and even less the destruction in part of the forest

The few opinions in favour of these projects that would disfigure Clamart just to save 5 minutes of travel time are not argued. Sorry, but the obsession with saving time has its limits: so little hypo

From my point of view, the extension of the T10 line to Clamart station is an obvious and a necessity. The terminus of the line at the Jardin Parisien (or even at the Place du Garde as initially plann